Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Uber tank a hulk... deny Hulkageddon'ers - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Originally by: Malaki Xhing This is the fit I came up with... The Hulkageddon II Decoy; Passive tanked, 27k effective hit points, and almost 80% resists across the board. http://eve.battleclinic.com/loadout/33675-Hulkageddon-Decoy.html ...
- by Good Advice - at 2010.01.07 04:31:00
|
2. [Proposal] Formations - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I wouldn't mind a simple Wall formation for defensive purposes. The ships are arranged and aligned together, and in return, get a defensive bonus. Ships could still be focus fired, but a % of the damage would be spread to its squadmates, instead o...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.12.27 18:01:00
|
3. [Proposal] Comprehensive War-Dec Reform - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I don't really see what is so bad about the possibility of being a target in a war. Why should some people be immune to PVP? If NPC corp members could be decced individually, maybe people would start trying to form real corporations of friends f...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.12.26 14:02:00
|
4. [proposal] ship velocity vectors - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I love this idea. I'd like to see it expanded even further into a true tactical display. In tactical mode, you'd get the velocity vectors, but you'd also have NO models load. Every ship would be represented by an icon for its type, color accordin...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.12.20 17:20:00
|
5. (Proposal) Much needed rebalance of passive Shield Tanks - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Something must be done. The large roaming gangs of passive-tanked drakes are destroying everyone who comes against them. We are all doomed. /sarcasm Its a niche role for a few ships, that has barely any effect on PVP outside of a few cases. Even...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.12.19 15:31:00
|
6. War Dec reform - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I like digital's idea of changing the alliance mechanic to remove corp-alliance wars, and keep wars at a corp vs corp basis. I'd un-nerf some of the escalating costs associated with multiple wardecs as well. I'd also like to see a true Mercenary ...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.12.11 03:36:00
|
7. Proposal: Fuzzy economics - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I'd rather see a combination of two approaches. 1. If two buy or sell orders are at the same price, a market transaction will apply to both of them based upon the %s. For example, Person A is selling 40 units at a certain price, and Person B is s...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.12.06 15:42:00
|
8. Insurance reform: it's time - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Each week CCP can calculated the avg price for every mineral based upon the volume and quantity sold. Insurance rates for that week would then be set at perfect build price -1 to -5%. This would insure that prices for insurance are in line with th...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.11.28 18:29:00
|
9. [Proposal] Change inheritance upon player death - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I like this. Easy fix, and useful.
- by Good Advice - at 2009.11.05 21:27:00
|
10. Meeting minutes from the CCP/CSM meeting? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
We're at around the 2 month mark for the meeting at this point. Have they canceled the CSM at just not told anyone?
- by Good Advice - at 2009.11.05 21:20:00
|
11. [ISSUE] Blasters 2.0 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I'd say that blasters need to be changed entirely and give something new to the gun field. Currently, Lasers have their niche, Projectiles are getting reworked to allow for some nice damage switching, but blasters work just like lasers, just worse...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.10.31 14:25:00
|
12. [Proposal] Allow feature to account for ship types in fleet / location - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The FC could create "tags" for members of their fleet, and each joining member selects whichever tags apply to them. Now, the FC or WCs can sort by Tag. Example Tags: Tackle Sniper BS Support Dread Carrier etc...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.10.30 10:59:00
|
13. [ISSUE] 7 weeks later ... CCP/CSM minutes STILL unposted - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Thank you for looking into this for us. I'm glad to see some communication about it.
- by Good Advice - at 2009.10.24 14:16:00
|
14. [ISSUE] 7 weeks later ... CCP/CSM minutes STILL unposted - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: De'Veldrin Originally by: The PitBoss FYI ... EVERYDAY CCP makes us wait is taking away from the credibility of the whole CSM program Your primary assumption (that the CSM still has any credibility left after...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.10.23 23:05:00
|
15. [ISSUE] 7 weeks later ... CCP/CSM minutes STILL unposted - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
After fanfest, someone posted saying that the minutes had to wait for information from CCP that couldn't be given until after fanfest. I read this, and thought it made sense. However, a lot of drama could have been avoided if they had clearly stat...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.10.23 20:25:00
|
16. Meeting minutes from the CCP/CSM meeting? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
This is starting to get silly. Why aren't these posted yet?
- by Good Advice - at 2009.10.09 21:08:00
|
17. CSM - does it serve an actual purpose? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Originally by: Iwant Urstuff The CSM is clearly abusing the priviledge of representing us. 1) CSM term limits as an issue was brought before the CSM with only THREE supports. How was this representing the EVE player base again? It is ...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.10.01 01:50:00
|
18. [Proposal] mechanism to raise standing with pirate factions - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Each faction should have a "corrupt" agent available in null-sec or low-sec. The agent would agree to allow people with negative standing to run missions and build up reputation, but in return, would claim all of a player's bounties, rewards, and ...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.09.29 20:17:00
|
19. New Dev Blog: I Bring Gifts! (By Gifts I Mean Taxes, Sorry) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The main issue with NPC corps seems to be their immunity to war-decs, and this change won't fix anything at all. People who want to avoid the flawed war-dec system, which even CCP has admitted is a "pay to grief" system (CSM Minutes), will form a ...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.09.23 11:14:00
|
20. CCP & Industrial Expansions - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Good Advice on 16/09/2009 00:34:04 1. Change the current title system - Allow a MUCH higher max number of titles (100-200) - Allow Titles to have 1-10 assigned BASES (systems, stations, or pos) - People could then be granted Titles...
- by Good Advice - at 2009.09.16 00:33:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |